Sean “Diddy” Combs’ former personal assistant has revealed shocking claims, alleging that his former employer ordered him to have s*x with a woman to prove his “loyalty.”
In an interview for Investigation Discovery’s docuseries The Fall of Diddy, Phillip Pines opened up about the disturbing allegations, which he previously outlined in a lawsuit filed against Combs in December.
Pines, who reportedly worked for Combs between 2019 and 2021, is suing the music mogul for s*xual battery, s*xual harassment, and s*x trafficking, claiming his job duties were tied to enabling Combs’ alleged s*xual activities.
Diddy, currently facing a lawsuit from Pines and others, is also awaiting trial for charges related to s*x trafficking and racketeering.
In the documentary, Pines shared that Diddy placed great importance on loyalty, recalling an incident that left him emotionally scarred. “My life changed, and I’ve never really recovered from it,” he said through tears.
Pines alleged that Combs had been drinking heavily before an alleged “freak-off” and pressured him into joining a s*x party after offering him alcohol. Pines described feeling confused and terrified, questioning whether this was a test or for Combs’ entertainment.
Despite the woman reportedly consenting, Pines said he quickly left after performing, once he no longer saw Combs. He also explained that he feared retaliation from Diddy, who he claimed could become violently angry at the slightest provocation.
“I didn’t know what was going to happen if I didn’t do this,” Pines said.
Now, with deep remorse, Pines reflected on the alleged incident, admitting that he believed a “bomb would explode” if he ever spoke out. He also mentioned his Christian background and how it influenced his struggle with what he claimed happened.
Diddy’s attorney, however, denied the allegations, stating: “No matter how many lawsuits are filed, it won’t change the fact that Mr. Combs has never s*xually assaulted, or s*x trafficked anyone—man or woman, adult or minor.” The attorney expressed confidence in a fair legal process and in Combs’ eventual vindication.
