Home Royal Family Man Admits To Trying To Harm The Queen After Being Caught At...

Man Admits To Trying To Harm The Queen After Being Caught At Windsor Castle With Crossbow 

Man Admits To Trying To Harm The Queen After Being Caught At Windsor Castle With Crossbow 

A former supermarket worker who was found on the grounds of Windsor Castle with a loaded crossbow told police he was “here to kill the queen”, it can be reported after he pleaded guilty to treason charges.

Queen Elizabeth II was in residence when Jaswant Singh Chail, 21, from Southampton, broke into the grounds of the castle wearing a mask and came within sight of her private apartments on Christmas Day 2021.

The officer who stopped him said he looked like “something out of a vigilante movie”.

Less than half an hour earlier, Chail had uploaded a video to TikTok saying he was taking revenge for the colonial-era Amritsar massacre of 1919 in India.

On Friday Chail pleaded guilty to charges under section two of the Treason Act 1842, along with possession of an offensive weapon and making threats to kill.

Chail appeared by video link from a room at Broadmoor secure mental hospital. He spoke only to enter his pleas.

A previous hearing was told that shortly after 8.10am on Christmas Day, an officer of the royal protection command was on duty in uniform at the gate that serves as the main vehicle and foot access into the private part of the castle.

The queen was in her private apartments at the time and the gate “allowed immediate access to the apartments. It is never open to the public,” said Kathryn Selby, prosecuting.

The officer saw Chail walking slowly through the private grounds toward him and began to approach him.

As he did so, the officer realized that Chail had his hood over his head and was wearing a mask, which the officer described as “like something out of a vigilante movie or dressed for Halloween”.

The officer was so concerned he unclipped his stun gun before saying: “Morning, can I help, mate?” Chail told him: “I am here to kill the queen.”

The officer then realized the man was holding a crossbow. The officer drew his stun gun and shouted for him to drop the weapon and get to his knees.

Chail immediately complied and placed his hands on top of his head when told to do so, before repeating: “I am here to kill the queen.”

The officer was joined by another protection officer who handcuffed Chail and he was arrested for possession of an offensive weapon and trespass on a protected site.

The crossbow was found to be loaded with a crossbow bolt with the safety catch off and ready to fire.

Two soldiers from the Grenadier guards who were on sentry duty heard Chail say: “I thought I was here to kill the Queen” and one described the crossbow as “made ready”.

During a search, a mobile phone was seized from Chail, and a handwritten note that read: “Please don’t remove my clothes, shoes and gloves, masks etc, don’t want postmortem, don’t want embalming, thank you and I’m sorry.”

The point where Chail was stopped was said to be close to the entrance of the queen’s private residence with a line of sight to the apartments.

Chail, who was 19 at the time of the attempted attack, was born in Winchester and is a British citizen. He was unemployed but had previously been working in a local Co-op supermarket and was living with his parents and twin sister in Hampshire.

He had no previous convictions, cautions, or reprimands and there were no traces of him on the police national computer.

Chail was assessed in custody and detained under the Mental Health Act before being sectioned and transferred to Broadmoor secure mental health unit.

He was eventually found fit for an interview on 14 February last year and charged on 2 August.

Chail pleaded guilty to attempting to injure or alarm the sovereign contrary to section two of the Treason Act 1842. He was also accused of having an offensive weapon, namely a loaded crossbow under the Prevention of Crime Act 1953. The third charge accused him of making a threat to kill by making the TikTok video, under the Offences against the Person Act 1861.

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version